Suggested Filters for the Following Footage >> FORUM
forum

forum



SearchSearch   Users   Registration   Entrance
Today: 18.06.2026 - 20:03:58
Pages:  1  

Suggested Filters for the Following Footage

MessageAuthor

RemoveDust & RemoveDirt 




BMWFAN

registered user


Statistics:
Messages: 676
Registration: 03.03.2001
27.09.22 - 23:46:09
Message # 1
RE: Suggested Filters for the Following Footage

Just tried these 2 functions. If you don't mind some smoothing, they work great. I had bad materila with lots of noise, dust and scratches. Tried Fizick Descratch and Despot, but not all of them were gone. With RemoveDust (thanks to Kassandro - search this forum), I've got what I wanted. Highly recommend...:D Not to mention speed....




Hellrot_VA

registered user


Statistics:
Messages: 156
Registration: 12.11.2001
27.09.22 - 23:55:45
Message # 2
RE: Suggested Filters for the Following Footage

i'd also suggest deblocking when you decode. unless the blocks i'm seeing are from the JPEGging process (please use PNG files for this sort of thing...) deblocking/deringing will reduce a fair bit of noise too, so your denoise settings wont need to be as aggressive.


---------------------------------
Is divorce in the air? Get the list and follow it! http://forum.dadsdivorce.com/viewtopic.php?t=13374

krisko

registered user


Statistics:
Messages: 6,311
Registration: 12.10.2003
28.09.22 - 00:01:54
Message # 3
RE: Suggested Filters for the Following Footage

Thanks. I'll try out your suggestions. No, the blocks are on the original :(


---------------------------------
02 Carbon Black/Black Leather, Cold/Premium Pkgs, HK, Xenon, Rev. Alert SMGII, ACS Interior components, Hamann Roof Wing, OEM Strut Bar, Intros Aero Polished 19s 2-3 In.lips, Potenzas, KONI Sports, Rogue RMS, Black Calis, SS F-Mid Pipes, AA Gen 3 Exh

Riuster

registered user


Statistics:
Messages: 197
Registration: 02.16.2003
28.09.22 - 00:12:19
Message # 4
RE: Suggested Filters for the Following Footage

I don't see the blocks too clearly, but then again my monitor is about to expire. They don't seem to be too awful though, so I'd recommend you to try MVTools's Deblock() for that. I've been said it works in a similar manner to H.264/AVC's deblocking which is probably a good thing. I also second the use of RemoveDust since the noise, while abundant, seems to be small in size. The version I use is called LRemoveDust_Planar and the script is the following one: Code:




DeezBMW

registered user


Statistics:
Messages: 3,935
Registration: 03.14.2001
28.09.22 - 00:19:17
Message # 5
RE: Suggested Filters for the Following Footage

BTW, DeSpot is amazing at what is does, which is dotcrawl (moving noise) removal. AFAIK it has nothing to do with spatio-temporal denoisers like LRemoveDust. The OP did say that the noise moved around, so he should probably try it.




Scott528iM

registered user


Statistics:
Messages: 43
Registration: 06.12.2002
28.09.22 - 00:27:10
Message # 6
RE: Suggested Filters for the Following Footage

Chainmax, I'll give it a shot. I know that Dgmpgdec has a deblocker based on h264 as well.




aurelius

registered user


Statistics:
Messages: 142
Registration: 10.11.2003
28.09.22 - 00:37:24
Message # 7
RE: Suggested Filters for the Following Footage
Aiff, Wav2 or sd II? : Previous topicNext topic: concatenating go pro mp4s
Pages:  1  

The administrator has prohibited guests from replying to messages! To register, follow the link: register


Participants