Mac Mini >> FORUM
forum

forum



SearchSearch   Users   Registration   Entrance
Today: 18.06.2026 - 20:46:57
Pages:  1  

Mac Mini

MessageAuthor

I ordered one right after it was announced. It should be here by Friday. It will perform about the same as a current PowerBook, and I've already seen Xbench results to support that statement.


---------------------------------
ZZZING 2000 Z3 2.3 Oxford Green Beige/Black Sharked, StrongStrut , Whalen Knob, LeatherZ, M upper shock mounts, Koni Sport Shocks, SSR Competition Wheels, HIR bulbs, Oxford Green Hardtop

ZZZING

registered user


Statistics:
Messages: 453
Registration: 09.30.2003
26.04.23 - 12:21:24
Message # 1
RE: Mac Mini

Wow, if it is as good as a powerbook....and only half the price. Wow. Of course a lot less than half if you already have a nice monitor etc.. Do you plan to record with it? Can you give a link to that benchmark? I would be REALLY interested in that.


---------------------------------
Chris

CMT

registered user


Statistics:
Messages: 3,138
Registration: 02.26.2001
26.04.23 - 12:32:18
Message # 2
RE: Mac Mini

You can look elsewhere on that site to compare against other Macs. I may use it for some recording, but I've got a PowerBook and a fast PC already, so the mini certainly won't be dedicated to recording.




Theodore

registered user


Statistics:
Messages: 5,215
Registration: 05.30.2003
26.04.23 - 12:40:21
Message # 3
RE: Mac Mini

it seems, according to the benchmark mentioned, that the faster mac mini is otherwise as fast as my 1.25GHz powerbook (total score 128, average of 3 runs) but has sucky hard drive performance. it also seems strange that mini mac has a lot worse performance on thread and memory tests. it seems apple may have had to cut some corners in making it so small...




Tom Sederburg

registered user


Statistics:
Messages: 2,729
Registration: 11.10.2001
26.04.23 - 12:51:24
Message # 4
RE: Mac Mini

Im a pc user and interested in switching my mbox setup to mac, via the mini mac. I was wondering how vital using an external hard drive would be. Since i would be dual running the pc and mac, all the mac ould be doing is running pro tools, and 80Gb would be fine for my purposes. My issue though is with the speed of the mini's disk access. How much would this affect pro tools behaviour do you think? Surely it cant be worse than running a drive through a (relatively) slow firewire bus?


---------------------------------
Follow me on Instragram @bassrebel 2003 2014 X1 X3.5i 2016 MB C300 4Matic

bassrebel

registered user


Statistics:
Messages: 2,139
Registration: 12.11.2003
26.04.23 - 12:59:52
Message # 5
RE: Mac Mini

My impression is that the Mac mini's internal drive is probably 4200 rpm... too slow imho.




shadowracer

registered user


Statistics:
Messages: 163
Registration: 04.21.2003
26.04.23 - 13:05:24
Message # 6
RE: Mac Mini

The thing i don't get though is even if the internal drive is slower, relatively speaking the firewire bus is much slower than the internal ide bus (50MB/second compared to 100MB/second respectively) so the actual speed of the internal drive is the bottle neck. But is the relatively slower rotational speed of the mini mac internal drive really that much slower than the 50MB/second max transfer rate of the firewire bus? If someone could clear this up that would be great!


---------------------------------
'99 323i clarion dvd player with touch screen two 10' jl w7 subs with 500 watt jl audio amp 18' spinner wheels. alarm with remote start more too come

jisceg22

registered user


Statistics:
Messages: 121
Registration: 05.12.2003
26.04.23 - 13:14:09
Message # 7
RE: Mac Mini
Hey, my plugin settings have gone away... : Previous topicNext topic: reaper states?
Pages:  1  

The administrator has prohibited guests from replying to messages! To register, follow the link: register


Participants